Merchant of Venice - William Shakespeare
William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice is probably one of his deepest, darkest comedies. And I'm of the opinion that the only reason we see it as dark and humorous-less is in light of the treatment of Jews during the Holocaust.The Merchant of Venice is about Bassanio's quest for fair Portia's hand. Having no money himself, he turns to Antonio, his dearest friend. (Some speculate on a homosexual relationship between Bassanio and Antonio.) All of Antonio's money is wrapped up in his ships and their cargo, and he doesn't expect their return for another two months. He sympathizes with Bassanio's situation and agrees to take a loan from Shylock. Instead of practicing usury with Antonio's bond, he asks that if Bassanio should forfeit, Shylock would then receive an equal pound of flesh from any part of Bassanio's body he should desire. (... Ew. Also, who in their right mind would agree to this? Honestly?)
Enter Portia and her situation. Her father's dead, but he's still managing to control her from the grave. Her suitors must choose from 3 caskets, if they should choose the right casket, then they have proven they deserve her and are then free to marry her. Her suitors thus far have been unsuitable... but here comes handsome Bassanio to woo! Her heart leaps! He ends up with the right casket! (Perhaps with some help from our fair lady?)
And just as soon as they begin celebrating, Bassanio receives word that Antonio's ships have been lost at sea, and Shylock is asking for his bond (one pound of flesh. Ew.)
Now, right before all of this happens, Shylock's daughter runs off with one of Antonio's known friends to marry. She leaves her father, steals a portion of his wealth, and reverts to Christianity. Naturally, Shylock is hurt, and since he can't blame himself, he seeks his revenge on Antonio...
My professor was quick to point out that during Shakespeare's time, life was quite different - more specifically, religious tolerance like we know today was completely unheard of then. Jews were even exiled from England in 1290ish, leaving pretty much only Christian citizens for centuries. Shakespeare's audience would be aware of the treatment of Jews in other countries (ghettos, lack of job opportunities, etc) but they wouldn't have seen it firsthand. In fact, the vast majority probably wouldn't have even met a Jew. There are obviously some pretty strong antisemitic undertones/overtones throughout the play. In the end, at one point, Shylock is forced to give up his religion and practice Christianity... he was essentially stripped of everything - his wealth, daughter, and identity by the end of the play. Apparently Shakespeare's audience would have expected this.
I think it's also important to point out that Shakespeare does make Shylock into a rather humane Jewish villain when most of his contemporaries simply made their Jewish villains into complete monsters.
Al Pacino's performance really made my heart bleed for Shylock. But then, Jeremy Irons's performance of Antonio, especially during the trial scene in Act IV, really made me sympathize for Antonio's situation. I'm not sure if I've ever been so torn between two characters before in my life!
Labels: Shakespeare










